Walker v. Walker
This text of 49 A. 133 (Walker v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The findings and conclusions of the learned court below resulted in a decree which the defendant condemns as unjust and illegal. It seems to us, however, that the decree was warranted by the testimony and a protection to the plaintiff against the fraud and injustice which threatened his financial ruin. The schemes concocted by the defendant were designed to deprive the plaintiff of his property and to render him penniless in his declining years. The decree complained of by the defendant checked him in his reckless and disreputable career. It is to be hoped that hereafter his record will be more acceptable to some persons who have had transactions with him than it has been heretofore.
As we have not discovered any error in the decree complained of we unhesitatingly affirm it.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A. 133, 199 Pa. 435, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-walker-pa-1901.