Walker v. . Walker
This text of 153 S.E. 926 (Walker v. . Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff brought suit to annul his marriage with defendant, and to this end set out three causes of action in his complaint. The defendant demurred for misjoinder of causes and her demurrer was overruled.
The judgment is affirmed. Hoke v. Glenn, 167 N. C., 594; Trust Co. v. Wilson, 182 N. C., 166; S. v. Trust Co., 192 N. C., 246; Griffin v. Baker, ibid., 297; S. v. McCanless, 193 N. C., 200.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 826, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-walker-nc-1930.