Walker v. . Walker

153 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 826, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 511
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 28, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought suit to annul his marriage with defendant, and to this end set out three causes of action in his complaint. The defendant demurred for misjoinder of causes and her demurrer was overruled.

The judgment is affirmed. Hoke v. Glenn, 167 N. C., 594; Trust Co. v. Wilson, 182 N. C., 166; S. v. Trust Co., 192 N. C., 246; Griffin v. Baker, ibid., 297; S. v. McCanless, 193 N. C., 200.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. . Walker, 153 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 826, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 511 (N.C. 1930).

153 S.E. 926 (Walker v. . Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. . Walker
159 S.E. 363 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)