Walker v. Walker

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Walker v. Walker

86 Me. 314

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1894·Published

Opinion

This also is an action on a promissory note given for taxes. The note differs from the former only in the fact that it was made payable to the treasurer of the town of Embden instead of to the town of Embden, and the action is in the name of the treasurer instead of the name of the town. The differences are immaterial; and,for the reasons stated in the former action, the entry must be, Judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This also is an action on a promissory note given for taxes. The note differs from the former only in the fact that it was made payable to the treasurer of the town of Embden instead of to the town of Embden, and the action is in the name of the treasurer instead of the name of the town. The differences are immaterial; and,for the reasons stated in the former action, the entry must be, Judgment for defendant.

Walker v. Walker, 86 Me. 314 (Me. 1894).

Pincite

86 Me. 314 (Walker v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.