Walker v. Walker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walker v. Walker

401 So. 2d 872, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20536

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 15, 1981

DocketNo. 80-855

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 401 So. 2d 872 (Walker v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Walker, 401 So. 2d 872, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

RYDER, Judge.

The appellant appeals from an order entered by the trial court setting aside a certain portion of a final judgment. The trial court’s order was entered pursuant to appellee’s motion for relief from judgment under rule 1.540(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Both the appellee’s rule 1.540(b) motion and the trial court’s order were filed after appellee had filed a notice of appeal from the original final judgment. This court has not been asked to relinquish jurisdiction for this purpose.

We hold that the lower court lost jurisdiction to enter an order pursuant to a rule 1.540(b) motion once the notice of appeal from the final judgment was filed. Hutchison v. Wintrode, 286 So.2d 231 (Fla.2d DCA 1973); Liberman v. Rhyne, 248 So.2d 242 (Fla.3d DCA 1971). In addition, we observe that the appellant asserts in her statement of the case and facts that the lower court entered the order setting aside a certain portion of the final judgment without a hearing being held or a notice being given to appellant. It appears from the brief filed by appellee that he accepted appellant’s assertion.

Accordingly, we REVERSE and VACATE the order entered below.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RYDER, Judge.

The appellant appeals from an order entered by the trial court setting aside a certain portion of a final judgment. The trial court’s order was entered pursuant to appellee’s motion for relief from judgment under rule 1.540(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Both the appellee’s rule 1.540(b) motion and the trial court’s order were filed after appellee had filed a notice of appeal from the original final judgment. This court has not been asked to relinquish jurisdiction for this purpose.

We hold that the lower court lost jurisdiction to enter an order pursuant to a rule 1.540(b) motion once the notice of appeal from the final judgment was filed. Hutchison v. Wintrode, 286 So.2d 231 (Fla.2d DCA 1973); Liberman v. Rhyne, 248 So.2d 242 (Fla.3d DCA 1971). In addition, we observe that the appellant asserts in her statement of the case and facts that the lower court entered the order setting aside a certain portion of the final judgment without a hearing being held or a notice being given to appellant. It appears from the brief filed by appellee that he accepted appellant’s assertion.

Accordingly, we REVERSE and VACATE the order entered below.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

401 So. 2d 872, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-walker-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack