Walker v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

Fourth Circuit

Walker v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24722, 1995 WL 404972

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

Docket95-1808

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 827 (Walker v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24722, 1995 WL 404972 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 827
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Homer W. WALKER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; R. Calvin
Thompson, Individually and as Acting Officer in
Charge/Compliance Specialist; Charles Broadwell,
Individually and as Editor; Mark Stinneford, Individually
and as Reporter; Fayetteville Observer-Times, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1808.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 10, 1995.

Homer W. Walker, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Homer W. Walker appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his complaint in which he alleged that the defendants had defamed him in a newspaper article. Because Walker failed to state a claim either under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) or Bivens*, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. United States Dep't of Agriculture, No. CA-95-24-5-MC (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 827
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Homer W. WALKER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; R. Calvin
Thompson, Individually and as Acting Officer in
Charge/Compliance Specialist; Charles Broadwell,
Individually and as Editor; Mark Stinneford, Individually
and as Reporter; Fayetteville Observer-Times, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1808.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 10, 1995.

Homer W. Walker, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Homer W. Walker appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his complaint in which he alleged that the defendants had defamed him in a newspaper article. Because Walker failed to state a claim either under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) or Bivens*, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. United States Dep't of Agriculture, No. CA-95-24-5-MC (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24722, 1995 WL 404972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-us-dept-of-agriculture-ca4-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack