Walker v. United States
231 F. App'x 711
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, the briefs and the response to this court’s February 22, 2007 order indicate that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. United States, 231 F. App'x 711 (9th Cir. 2007).
231 F. App'x 711 (Walker v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)