Walker v. Stroud

Texas Supreme Court

Walker v. Stroud

3 Tex. L. R. 121

DecidedJuly 1, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Tex. L. R. 121 (Walker v. Stroud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Stroud, 3 Tex. L. R. 121 (Tex. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal — Practice.—Tins motion to dismiss the appeal bond is based on several grounds, all of which are fatal to the case, but one in particular requires a dismissal of the ease. The judgment appealed from is in favor of L. A. Stroud, and the appeal bond is signed by him. He not being a valid surety, and there being but one other on the bond, it, is insufficient, and for this reason the appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal — Practice.—Tins motion to dismiss the appeal bond is based on several grounds, all of which are fatal to the case, but one in particular requires a dismissal of the ease. The judgment appealed from is in favor of L. A. Stroud, and the appeal bond is signed by him. He not being a valid surety, and there being but one other on the bond, it, is insufficient, and for this reason the appeal must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Tex. L. R. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-stroud-tex-1884.