Walker v. Story

82 S.E. 355, 14 Ga. App. 803, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 454
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 21, 1914·No. 5533·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. An opinionative statement of a seller’s .agent as to the value or salability of patented articles can not amount to such fraud, though untrue, as will entitle the buyer to avoid the sale, and an oral representation of such an agent, that the article sold will prove salable and produce certain named profits, not being enforceable under the statute of frauds, can not afford a basis for a rescission by the buyer. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Anderson, 13 Ga. App. 772 (80 S. E. 32).

2. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the defendant’s answer, and in thereafter entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff upon notes sued on, the only defense attempted being that the execution of the notes was induced by false representation of an agent of the plaintiff as to the probable value of the territory and of the articles which constituted the consideration thereof.

Judgment affirmed.

Rom, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Story, 82 S.E. 355, 14 Ga. App. 803, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 454 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

82 S.E. 355 (Walker v. Story) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parris & Son, Inc. v. Campbell
196 S.E.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Walters v. Hagan
186 S.E. 563 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Rogers v. Sinclair Refining Co.
174 S.E. 207 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)