Walker v. State

361 S.W.2d 376, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 791
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 24, 1962
DocketNo. 34876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 361 S.W.2d 376 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 361 S.W.2d 376, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 791 (Tex. 1962).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is Burglary; the punishment, 2 years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

The proceedings are regular except for the form of the Judgment and Sentence which recite the offense as “Burglary and Repetition of Offense”.

The court did not submit to the jury the question of enhancement of punishment by reason of the prior conviction alleged.

The Judgment and Sentence are reformed so as to recite that appellant was adjudged guilty of Burglary and was sentenced for that offense.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zenon v. State
661 S.W.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 S.W.2d 376, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-texcrimapp-1962.