Walker v. State

361 S.W.2d 376, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 791
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 24, 1962·No. No. 34876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is Burglary; the punishment, 2 years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

The proceedings are regular except for the form of the Judgment and Sentence which recite the offense as “Burglary and Repetition of Offense”.

The court did not submit to the jury the question of enhancement of punishment by reason of the prior conviction alleged.

The Judgment and Sentence are reformed so as to recite that appellant was adjudged guilty of Burglary and was sentenced for that offense.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 361 S.W.2d 376, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 791 (Tex. 1962).

361 S.W.2d 376 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zenon v. State
661 S.W.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)