Walker v. State

227 S.W. 308, 88 Tex. Crim. 389, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 463
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 17, 1920·No. No. 5759.·Published·Cited by 25 cases

Opinions

Appellant presents an application for writ of certiorari to perfect the record. The basis of this is found in the following statement: Appellant presented to the court a bill of exceptions for his approval. The court took the bill, and, after keeping *Page 392 it for a while, qualified and filed it without notice to or consent of appellant. When this was done appellant filed an exception to the action of the court, accompanied also by a by-standers' bill showing the facts. The merits of the question are not here discussed, but believing that the matter should have been sent up in the record so this court could fully understand the situation and how the bill was filed, and connecting circumstances, the application for certiorari will be granted, and the clerk of the trial court ordered to send up an additional transcript showing these bills of exception and the true status of the case. There may be questions for discussion when the matter is before the court, first, whether this court under all the circumstances will consider the bill as filed by the judge with his qualification under the circumstances stated; second, whether this court will consider the bystanders' bill in connection with appellant's exception to the action of the court in qualifying his bill without his knowledge or consent, and filing it in the record. The application for certiorari, therefore, will be awarded and the clerk of the trial court directed to send up an additional transcript showing these matters.

Order for additional transcript.

OPINION, May, 1920.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 227 S.W. 308, 88 Tex. Crim. 389, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 463 (Tex. 1920).

227 S.W. 308 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silva v. State
546 S.W.2d 618 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Whitson v. State
495 S.W.2d 944 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Fitch v. State
384 S.W.2d 719 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Cain v. State
226 S.W.2d 640 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Webb v. State
106 S.W.2d 683 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Burleson v. State
100 S.W.2d 1019 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Cranfill v. State
87 S.W.2d 740 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Cobb v. State
77 S.W.2d 667 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Chance v. State
68 S.W.2d 212 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Gilbreth v. State
63 S.W.2d 560 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Teague v. State
60 S.W.2d 244 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Music v. Delong
229 N.W. 673 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1930)
Johnson v. State
152 S.E. 76 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Ely v. Lasch
11 S.W.2d 593 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Benton and Gipson v. State
300 S.W. 75 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Barrington v. State
291 S.W. 557 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Keller v. State
253 S.W. 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Kennamer v. State
247 S.W. 560 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Smith v. State
237 S.W. 265 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)