Walker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Walker v. State

217 S.W. 939

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 14, 1920

DocketNo. 5629

StatusPublished

This text of 217 S.W. 939 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. State, 217 S.W. 939 (Tex. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

This appeal was prosecuted from a conviction for burglary.

The record does not contain a statement of the facts or bill of exceptions. The motion for a new trial complains of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. Without the facts this court cannot intelligently revise any of the grounds set up in the motion.

As the record is presented to this court, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

This appeal was prosecuted from a conviction for burglary.

The record does not contain a statement of the facts or bill of exceptions. The motion for a new trial complains of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. Without the facts this court cannot intelligently revise any of the grounds set up in the motion.

As the record is presented to this court, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 S.W. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-texcrimapp-1920.