Walker v. State

24 S.W. 909, 32 Tex. Crim. 517, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 211
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 1894·No. No. 241.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The writ of error herein is prosecuted from a final judgment rendered upon the forfeiture of a bail bond, in which it is recited, that the principal was required to answer the offense of carrying “ on or about her person a dirk.” In the first error assigned it is con *518 tended, that the said bond is not a valid undertaking in law, because it recites no offense against the penal laws of this State, in that the said offense is therein set out in the disjunctive. The point is well taken. Hart v. The State, 2 Texas Cr. App., 39; Garza v. The State, 22 S. W. Rep., 139.

We deem it unnecessary to notice the remaining question suggested. For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed; and because the bail bond is insufficient to constitute the basis of a judgment, the cause is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 24 S.W. 909, 32 Tex. Crim. 517, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 211 (Tex. 1894).

24 S.W. 909 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. State
576 S.W.2d 395 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Harris v. State
126 S.W. 890 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Lewellen v. State
114 S.W. 1179 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Hannon v. State
87 S.W. 152 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)