Walker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Walker v. State

1926 OK CR 268, 246 P. 1118, 34 Okla. Crim. 393, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 250

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1926

DocketNo. A-5525.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 268 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. State, 1926 OK CR 268, 246 P. 1118, 34 Okla. Crim. 393, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 250 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER 'CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, with a codefendant, Edgar Eddington, was tried and convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 4 months, and there was a joint appeal. The appeal of the codefendant Edgar Eddington has heretofore been dismissed. The case was tried in November, 1924, and appeal was lodged in this court in April, 1925. No briefs have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made. We have examined the record and find that the evidence sustains the judgment. The defendant did not testify. No error requiring a reversal is apparent. The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER 'CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, with a codefendant, Edgar Eddington, was tried and convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 4 months, and there was a joint appeal. The appeal of the codefendant Edgar Eddington has heretofore been dismissed. The case was tried in November, 1924, and appeal was lodged in this court in April, 1925. No briefs have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made. We have examined the record and find that the evidence sustains the judgment. The defendant did not testify. No error requiring a reversal is apparent. The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 268, 246 P. 1118, 34 Okla. Crim. 393, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.