Walker v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1670 _____________________________
DERRICK LAMAR WALKER,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
August 13, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for clarification and motion to compel discovery, the Court dismisses the petition and amended petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
RAY, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Derrick Lamar Walker, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. State of Florida (Walker v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.