Walker v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Walker v. State

539 P.2d 461, 91 Nev. 528

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 26, 1975

DocketNo. 7999

StatusPublished

This text of 539 P.2d 461 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. State, 539 P.2d 461, 91 Nev. 528 (Neb. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The sole issue on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the lower court’s discretionary act of revoking appellant’s probation and executing the original sentence.

The record reflects proof of at least five substantive violations by appellant of the terms and conditions of his probation agreement. While appellant attempted to offer mitigating evidence in his own defense, none of the violations were denied. There was more than ample evidence to justify the court’s action. See Lewis V. State, 90 Nev. 436, 529 P.2d 796 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The sole issue on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the lower court’s discretionary act of revoking appellant’s probation and executing the original sentence.

The record reflects proof of at least five substantive violations by appellant of the terms and conditions of his probation agreement. While appellant attempted to offer mitigating evidence in his own defense, none of the violations were denied. There was more than ample evidence to justify the court’s action. See Lewis V. State, 90 Nev. 436, 529 P.2d 796 (1974).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 P.2d 461, 91 Nev. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-nev-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack