Walker v. State

399 S.W.3d 929, 2013 WL 2431983, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 670
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. ED 98836·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Allen Walker (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his amended Rule 24.0351 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Roberts v. State, 276 S.W.3d 833, 835 (Mo. banc 2009). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the [930]*930judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) Mo. R. Civ. P. (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 399 S.W.3d 929, 2013 WL 2431983, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 670 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

399 S.W.3d 929 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
276 S.W.3d 833 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2009)