Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Walker v. State

Walker v. State

285 S.W.3d 834, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 974, 2009 WL 1851089
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 2009
DocketWD 69232
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 S.W.3d 834 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 285 S.W.3d 834, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 974, 2009 WL 1851089 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mark D. Walker appeals the circuit court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief in which he claimed that the State failed to disclose that its witness had prior convictions. After a thorough review of the record, we *835 conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A published opinion would have no prece-dential value; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langley v. Sullivan
285 S.W.3d 834 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 S.W.3d 834, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 974, 2009 WL 1851089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-moctapp-2009.