Walker v. State

193 S.W.3d 794, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2006 WL 1604452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1044
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2006·No. No. ED 86784·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerald K. Walker (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits without an evidentia-ry hearing. Movant claims the court clearly erred in denying his motion because his guilty plea was involuntarily entered.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[795]*795The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 193 S.W.3d 794, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2006 WL 1604452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

193 S.W.3d 794 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.