Walker v. State
862 S.W.2d 389, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 1993 WL 344328
Opinion
ORDER
We find the motion court did not clearly err in dismissing Defendant’s successive motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.15(j) and (k). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. State, 862 S.W.2d 389, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 1993 WL 344328 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
862 S.W.2d 389 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.