Walker v. State
This text of Walker v. State (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Carroll County Case No. C-06-CR-19-000833 Petition No. 141, September Term, 2022 Argued: December 5, 2022 IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF MARYLAND
No. 19
September Term, 2022 ______________________________________
KEVRON D. WALKER
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND ______________________________________
Fader, C.J. Watts Hotten* Booth Biran Gould Eaves, JJ. ______________________________________
PER CURIAM ______________________________________
Filed: May 8, 2024
*Hotten, J., participated in the hearing and Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal decision in this matter as an active justice. She Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State participated in the decision to dismiss the Government Article) this document is authentic. petition and the case as improvidently granted as 2024.05.08 a senior justice on recall. 14:31:08 -04'00'
Gregory Hilton, Clerk * IN THE KEVRON D. WALKER * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * No. 19 STATE OF MARYLAND * September Term, 2022
ORDER
After Kevron D. Walker’s petition for writ of certiorari was granted, the case was
briefed and argued. In the Court’s July 28, 2023 opinion, the case was remanded to the
circuit court for further proceedings. The Court retained jurisdiction over the matter and,
after the proceedings on remand, the circuit court transmitted its written findings as
directed in the opinion and the parties moved to supplement the record with the materials
presented at the remand hearing. The parties also filed supplemental briefs.
Upon consideration of the briefs and supplemental briefs, the circuit court’s written
findings, and the entire record as supplemented, it is this 8th day of May 2024, by the
Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that the writ of certiorari and this case are dismissed as improvidently
granted, and it is further,
ORDERED that costs are to be paid by Petitioner and the mandate is to issue
forthwith.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Walker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-md-2024.