Walker v. State

131 S.E. 187, 34 Ga. App. 780, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 26
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1926
Docket16949
StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 187 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 131 S.E. 187, 34 Ga. App. 780, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While the evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense charged was circumstantial, this court can not say, as a matter of law, that the jury were not authorized to find that the evidence was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and, the verdict of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 187, 34 Ga. App. 780, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-gactapp-1926.