Walker v. State
122 S.E. 645, 32 Ga. App. 18, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 222
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of manufacturing whisky. The evidence failed to establish that any whisky had been made at the distillery in question, or that the beer found there by the arresting officers was intoxicating. The verdict, therefore, was unauthorized, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was error. If the conviction had been for an attempt to manufacture whisky, another question would have-been presented.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. State, 122 S.E. 645, 32 Ga. App. 18, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 222 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
122 S.E. 645 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sims v. State
196 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Simmons v. State
137 S.E. 791 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)