Walker v. State

97 S.E. 195, 22 Ga. App. 765, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 740
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 1, 1918
Docket9642
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 195 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 97 S.E. 195, 22 Ga. App. 765, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 740 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Harwell, J.

The demurrer to the plea in abatement, based upon the ground of alleged former jeopardy or autrefois convict, was properly sustained by the judge of the city court; the judgment and sentence in the former case being rendered by the judge of the superior court in a county other than that in which the crime was committed, and being void and a nullity for want of jurisdiction. The decision herein is controlled by the ruling of this court in Barrs v. State, ante, 644.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. State
291 S.E.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 195, 22 Ga. App. 765, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-gactapp-1918.