Walker v. State

81 S.E. 797, 14 Ga. App. 587, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 388
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1914
Docket5636
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 S.E. 797 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 81 S.E. 797, 14 Ga. App. 587, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 388 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Wade, J.

Since the question of identity is for determination by the jury

(McLain v. State, 71 Ga. 279, Mitchum v. State, 11 Ga. 615), where an indictment charged the defendant with the crime of adultery, committed with a woman called “Velma Shider,” and there was some proof that she was sometimes known by this name, though she. testified that she had always been called “Genie Shider,” and another witness said he “had never heard her called anything else,” there was no such variance between the allegata and the probata as to demand a new trial. ' No error of law is complained of, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. State
107 S.E. 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 S.E. 797, 14 Ga. App. 587, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-gactapp-1914.