Walker v. State

81 S.E. 797, 14 Ga. App. 587, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 388
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 14, 1914·No. 5636·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

Since the question of identity is for determination by the jury

(McLain v. State, 71 Ga. 279, Mitchum v. State, 11 Ga. 615), where an indictment charged the defendant with the crime of adultery, committed with a woman called “Velma Shider,” and there was some proof that she was sometimes known by this name, though she. testified that she had always been called “Genie Shider,” and another witness said he “had never heard her called anything else,” there was no such variance between the allegata and the probata as to demand a new trial. ' No error of law is complained of, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 81 S.E. 797, 14 Ga. App. 587, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 388 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

81 S.E. 797 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
107 S.E. 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)