Walker v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Walker v. State

28 S.E.2d 656, 197 Ga. 221, 1944 Ga. LEXIS 236

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 12, 1944

Docket14702.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 28 S.E.2d 656 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. State, 28 S.E.2d 656, 197 Ga. 221, 1944 Ga. LEXIS 236 (Ga. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Justice.

1. The evidence was sufficient to prove the crime of rape and to identify the accused as the perpetrator.

2. The testimony of the sheriff as to a statement made by a physician in the presence of the accused upon examining his person within an hour or two after the time it was claimed that the offense was committed, and expressing an opinion that the accused had “right recently” had sexual intercourse, the witness further testifying, “the defendant did not make a reply to what the doctor said,” was not subject to objection on the ground that it was “highly prejudicial to the defendant and was purely hearsay,” and was of sirch nature that it “could only come from an expert or duly qualified physician himself.” Code, § 38-409; Smiley v. State, 156 Ga. 60 (118 S. E. 713) ; Emmett v. State, 195 Ga. 517 (2), 535 (25 S. E. 2d, 9).

(a) The testimony was admissible as tending to show an implied admission by the accused, through acquiescence or silence; -whereas decisions to the effect that a witness will not be permitted to prove the opinion of another are based on the rule against hearsay. The case is therefore unlike Sullivan v. Collier, 32 Ga. 316, and "Wynes v. State, 182 Ga. 434 (2) (185 S. E. 711), relied on by the plaintiff in error.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. As to former appearance of the same case, see 194 Ga. 727 (22 S. E. 2d, 462). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Justice.

1. The evidence was sufficient to prove the crime of rape and to identify the accused as the perpetrator.

2. The testimony of the sheriff as to a statement made by a physician in the presence of the accused upon examining his person within an hour or two after the time it was claimed that the offense was committed, and expressing an opinion that the accused had “right recently” had sexual intercourse, the witness further testifying, “the defendant did not make a reply to what the doctor said,” was not subject to objection on the ground that it was “highly prejudicial to the defendant and was purely hearsay,” and was of sirch nature that it “could only come from an expert or duly qualified physician himself.” Code, § 38-409; Smiley v. State, 156 Ga. 60 (118 S. E. 713) ; Emmett v. State, 195 Ga. 517 (2), 535 (25 S. E. 2d, 9).

(a) The testimony was admissible as tending to show an implied admission by the accused, through acquiescence or silence; -whereas decisions to the effect that a witness will not be permitted to prove the opinion of another are based on the rule against hearsay. The case is therefore unlike Sullivan v. Collier, 32 Ga. 316, and "Wynes v. State, 182 Ga. 434 (2) (185 S. E. 711), relied on by the plaintiff in error.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. As to former appearance of the same case, see 194 Ga. 727 (22 S. E. 2d, 462). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 S.E.2d 656, 197 Ga. 221, 1944 Ga. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-ga-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack