Walker v. State

576 So. 2d 434, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 777, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 546 So. 2d 764
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1991·No. No. 90-02381·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's convictions but reverse the appellant’s habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing. In order to be sentenced as a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988), a defendant must have successive felony convictions. The appellant’s two prior convictions were rendered on the same date, and so they should have been treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 576 So. 2d 434, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 777, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2627 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

576 So. 2d 434 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
567 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)