Walker v. State

568 So. 2d 991, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8217, 1990 WL 162382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 546 So. 2d 764
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 1990·No. No. 89-02237·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Romerio Latee Walker, challenges the judgment and sentence which resulted from his conviction for robbery without a firearm. We affirm the appellant’s conviction but strike the imposition of court costs and the attorney’s lien without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989); Lundy v. State, 559 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 568 So. 2d 991, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8217, 1990 WL 162382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

568 So. 2d 991 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. State
544 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Lundy v. State
559 So. 2d 1308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)