Walker v. State

259 So. 2d 181, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7059
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 So. 2d 760
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 1972·No. No. 71-497·Published

Opinion

LILES, Judge.

Appellant, Cleon Donald Walker, was convicted of the charge of being an habitual criminal. Following his conviction by jury on February 1, 1963, appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment. In May 1971, appellant filed his Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A., motion to vacate judgment and sentence based upon the fact that in the two [182]*182prior convictions he was not represented by counsel.

In March 1963, Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, was decided providing that all defendants must be represented by counsel and subsequent case law provides that Gideon is retroactive.

We believe the trial judge was in error in summarily dismissing defendant’s Rule 1.850 motion and we remand the cause with directions that the trial judge hold an evi-dentiary hearing with petitioner represented by counsel and make a determination of fact as to whether petitioner was properly convicted pursuant to Gideon of the two prior crimes.

Reversed and remanded.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 259 So. 2d 181, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7059 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

259 So. 2d 181 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)