Walker v. State

85 S.W.3d 919, 350 Ark. 267, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 484
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 3, 2002
DocketCR 02-955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 S.W.3d 919 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 85 S.W.3d 919, 350 Ark. 267, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 484 (Ark. 2002).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Antonio DeWayne Walker, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert L. Scull, admits in his motion that the record was tendered more than seven months beyond date of the original judgment due to a mistake on his part.1

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marcus Dwayne Colvin v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.W.3d 919, 350 Ark. 267, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-ark-2002.