Walker v. State
This text of 85 S.W.3d 919 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Antonio DeWayne Walker, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert L. Scull, admits in his motion that the record was tendered more than seven months beyond date of the original judgment due to a mistake on his part.1
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.W.3d 919, 350 Ark. 267, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-ark-2002.