Walker v. State

759 S.W.2d 791, 296 Ark. 303, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 12, 1988
DocketRC 88-39
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 759 S.W.2d 791 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 759 S.W.2d 791, 296 Ark. 303, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 369 (Ark. 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam

Appellant, Robin Walker, by his attorney, Beverly C. Claunch, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to her miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals In Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gipson v. Munson
752 S.W.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
759 S.W.2d 791, 296 Ark. 303, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-ark-1988.