Walker v. State

148 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 692
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 1933·No. 6 Div. 421.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of unlawfully transporting prohibited liquors or beverages in quantities of five gallons or more. He was duly sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in - the penitentiary, and, from the judgment of conviction, this appeal was taken.

The evidence presented a question for the jury to determine; hence there was no error in refusing the affirmative charge requested by defendant.

Pour other charges, none of which are numbered, were refused to defendant. These charges were either involved or abstract, and there was no error in their refusal.

The motion for a new trial was based upon the general grounds to the effect that verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the evidence. Nothing was offered in support of the motion. As stated, the evidence presented a jury question. The motion for new trial was properly overruled. No other questions are presented. There being no error, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 148 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

148 So. 926 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.