Walker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Walker v. State

125 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 685

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 17, 1929

Docket4 Div. 563.

StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 927 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. State, 125 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The second count of the indictment, and upon which this appellant was convicted, charged the appellant with the offense of grand larceny, in that “he feloniously took and carried away from the storehouse of J. E. Parrish four shirts, of the value- of $8, seven ties, of the value of $7, and a lot of clothing, of the value of $105, all of the said property being of the aggregate value of $120, the personal property of the said J. E. Parish,” etc. The court fixed the punishment at not less than 20 months’ nor more than 21 months’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. Judgment of conviction was accordingly pronounced and entered, from which this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is regular in all things and without error, the judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The second count of the indictment, and upon which this appellant was convicted, charged the appellant with the offense of grand larceny, in that “he feloniously took and carried away from the storehouse of J. E. Parrish four shirts, of the value- of $8, seven ties, of the value of $7, and a lot of clothing, of the value of $105, all of the said property being of the aggregate value of $120, the personal property of the said J. E. Parish,” etc. The court fixed the punishment at not less than 20 months’ nor more than 21 months’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. Judgment of conviction was accordingly pronounced and entered, from which this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is regular in all things and without error, the judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-alactapp-1929.