Walker v. State

85 So. 305, 17 Ala. App. 416, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 87
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 13, 1920
Docket4 Div. 616.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 So. 305 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 85 So. 305, 17 Ala. App. 416, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 87 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of robbery, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 20 years.

The appeal is upon the record proper without a bill of exceptions. The only two ques tions presented by this appeal are: (1) The overruling of the demurrers to the indictment on the ground of an insufficient description of the money alleged to have been feloniously taken, etc.; and (2) that the verdict of the jury was indefinite and not sufficient to support the judgment of the court.

These two identical questions have been decided adversely to the contention of the defendant by the Supreme Court in a recent decision, Isaac Baldwin v. State, 85 South. 304, 1 opinion by Justice Sayre, under date of February 12, 1920. Under authority of that case, the judgment of conviction in the instant ease is affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

204 Ala. 91.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardner v. State
87 So. 885 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 So. 305, 17 Ala. App. 416, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-alactapp-1920.