Walker v. State

800 So. 2d 139, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 145, 2000 WL 681045
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMay 26, 2000
DocketCR-97-0719
StatusPublished

This text of 800 So. 2d 139 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 800 So. 2d 139, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 145, 2000 WL 681045 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

FRY, Judge.

Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision in Ex parte Walker, 800 So.2d 135 (Ala.2000), the judgment as it relates to Walker’s claim alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is due to be reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with that opinion. On remand, the circuit court may conduct such further proceedings or take such evidence as it deems necessary. The circuit court shall take all necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this Court at the earliest possible time and within 56 days of the release of this opinion. The return to remand shall include the circuit court’s written order and a transcript of the remand proceedings conducted by the circuit court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

LONG, P.J., and McMILLAN, COBB, and BASCHAB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Walker
800 So. 2d 135 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
800 So. 2d 139, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 145, 2000 WL 681045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-alacrimapp-2000.