Walker v. State
664 So. 2d 897, 1995 Ala. LEXIS 284, 1995 WL 385904
This text of 664 So. 2d 897 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Walker v. State, 664 So. 2d 897, 1995 Ala. LEXIS 284, 1995 WL 385904 (Ala. 1995).
Opinion
In denying the writ, this Court should not be understood as agreeing with the rationale of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The trial court’s ruling on the defendant’s objection and motion for mistrial was correct under independent state law evidentiary principles. See, e.g., Shoemaker v. State, 481 So.2d 409 (Ala.Crim.App.1985).
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shoemaker v. State
481 So. 2d 409 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
664 So. 2d 897, 1995 Ala. LEXIS 284, 1995 WL 385904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-ala-1995.