Walker v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Walker v. Smith

310 F. App'x 617

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 9, 2009·No. No. 08-7719·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin D. Walker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walker v. Smith, No. 1:07-cv-02717-RDB (D.Md. Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin D. Walker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walker v. Smith, No. 1:07-cv-02717-RDB (D.Md. Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Walker v. Smith, 310 F. App'x 617 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

310 F. App'x 617 (Walker v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related