Walker v. Smith

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 2009
Docket08-7719
StatusUnpublished

This text of Walker v. Smith (Walker v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7719

KEVIN D. WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AUTHUR SMITH, Department of Police; S. L. SCHULTZ, #2552; G. BRANDT, #1537; KNODE, Ofc.; DIETZ, Ofc.; CINDY MESSER SMITH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02717-RDB)

Submitted: January 28, 2009 Decided: February 9, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin D. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Douglas Peter, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin D. Walker appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Walker v. Smith, No. 1:07-cv-02717-

RDB (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Walker v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-smith-ca4-2009.