Walker v. Sheldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walker v. Sheldon

12 A.D.2d 740, 211 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13280

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 740 (Walker v. Sheldon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Sheldon, 12 A.D.2d 740, 211 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by defendant Milton U. Sheldon for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendant’s motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law?” Settle order on notice. Motion by defendants Samuel F. Chemoble, Edith Chernoble, Comet Press Books Corp. and Comet Press, Inc., for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law? ” Settle order on notice. Concur—• Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by defendant Milton U. Sheldon for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendant’s motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law?” Settle order on notice. Motion by defendants Samuel F. Chemoble, Edith Chernoble, Comet Press Books Corp. and Comet Press, Inc., for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law? ” Settle order on notice. Concur—• Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 740, 211 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-sheldon-nyappdiv-1961.