Walker v. Sheldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walker v. Sheldon

12 A.D.2d 740, 211 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13280

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. Sheldon. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 A.D.2d 456 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1961·Published

Opinion

Motion by defendant Milton U. Sheldon for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendant’s motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law?” Settle order on notice. Motion by defendants Samuel F. Chemoble, Edith Chernoble, Comet Press Books Corp. and Comet Press, Inc., for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law? ” Settle order on notice. Concur—• Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by defendant Milton U. Sheldon for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendant’s motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law?” Settle order on notice. Motion by defendants Samuel F. Chemoble, Edith Chernoble, Comet Press Books Corp. and Comet Press, Inc., for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law? ” Settle order on notice. Concur—• Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ.

Walker v. Sheldon, 12 A.D.2d 740, 211 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

12 A.D.2d 740 (Walker v. Sheldon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.