Walker v. Sargeant

13 Vt. 352
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedFebruary 15, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Vt. 352 (Walker v. Sargeant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Sargeant, 13 Vt. 352 (Vt. 1841).

Opinion

(Practice,')

Where the court, after a full hearing of a case, do not agree upon a judgment and continue the suit, the clerk will charge a judgment fee as in cases where judgments are rendered.

When a jury do not agree upon a verdict, it would, seem that a jury fee should be paid and an attorney fee allowed, as in cases where a verdict is rendered.

The court failing to agree upon the proper determination of this case, it was continued, after a full hearing, for further argument.

In making up the debenture, the clerk applied to the court for direction whether he should charge fees as of a judgment, the statute requiring him to account for a judgment fee “ in each action tried.”

By the court. Fees as of a judgment on trial, should be charged. The case is the same, in principle, as where the jury fail to agree upon a verdict in the county court. And in that case it has been customary, in most parts of the state, to charge a jury fee as well as a full attorney fee in favor of the party recovering, and we think the practice is in accordance with the true intent of the terms of the statute. Such actions are as really “ tried” as any other, although not always as effectually.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pollard v. Wheelock
20 Vt. 370 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Vt. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-sargeant-vt-1841.