Walker v. Ridley Cleaners, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Walker v. Ridley Cleaners, Inc.

18 N.W.2d 256, 311 Mich. 4

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 1945

DocketDocket No. 33, Calendar No. 42,742.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 18 N.W.2d 256 (Walker v. Ridley Cleaners, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Ridley Cleaners, Inc., 18 N.W.2d 256, 311 Mich. 4 (Mich. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Wiest, J.

In November, 1942, defendant Ridley Cleaners, Inc., employed plaintiff, a 16-year-old boy, *5 to work in its rug cleaning department, upon his written representation that he was 18 years of age. In the course of such employment the boy, while engaged in putting a 9 by 12 rug through an electric wringer, reached out his hand- to pull a wrinkle out of the rug, slipped' and the rolls of the machine caught his hands, resulting in loss of his right forearm and use of his left arm. Defendant Eidley Cleaners, Inc., were operating under the workmen’s compensation law, with defendant Consolidated Underwriters as liability insurance carrier. Upon application, the department of labor and industry awarded plaintiff1 double compensation from which award this appeal was taken.

Eight to single compensation is conceded and the question turns upon whether, under the circumstances here involved, the right to double compensation was warranted. The answer to the question is found in our holding to the contrary in Boshaw v. J. J. Newberry Co., 259 Mich. 333 (83 A. L. R. 412). The employer must act in good faith and under circumstances reasonably showing entrapment of hiring by .the applicant’s prevarication as to age and not negatived by his apparent age. See Blanton v. Clay Products Co., 310 Mich. 635. The department was in error in awarding double compensation. We find no occasion to discuss other alleged errors.

The award is set aside and the case remanded to the department of labor and industry to enter an award of single compensation, Defendants will recover costs.

Starr, C. J., and North, Btjtzel, Bushnell, Sharpe, Boyles, and Eeid, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiest, J.

In November, 1942, defendant Ridley Cleaners, Inc., employed plaintiff, a 16-year-old boy, *5 to work in its rug cleaning department, upon his written representation that he was 18 years of age. In the course of such employment the boy, while engaged in putting a 9 by 12 rug through an electric wringer, reached out his hand- to pull a wrinkle out of the rug, slipped' and the rolls of the machine caught his hands, resulting in loss of his right forearm and use of his left arm. Defendant Eidley Cleaners, Inc., were operating under the workmen’s compensation law, with defendant Consolidated Underwriters as liability insurance carrier. Upon application, the department of labor and industry awarded plaintiff1 double compensation from which award this appeal was taken.

Eight to single compensation is conceded and the question turns upon whether, under the circumstances here involved, the right to double compensation was warranted. The answer to the question is found in our holding to the contrary in Boshaw v. J. J. Newberry Co., 259 Mich. 333 (83 A. L. R. 412). The employer must act in good faith and under circumstances reasonably showing entrapment of hiring by .the applicant’s prevarication as to age and not negatived by his apparent age. See Blanton v. Clay Products Co., 310 Mich. 635. The department was in error in awarding double compensation. We find no occasion to discuss other alleged errors.

The award is set aside and the case remanded to the department of labor and industry to enter an award of single compensation, Defendants will recover costs.

Starr, C. J., and North, Btjtzel, Bushnell, Sharpe, Boyles, and Eeid, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.W.2d 256, 311 Mich. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-ridley-cleaners-inc-mich-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack