Walker v. Randal
85 Pa. Super. 443, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301
Opinion
The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $2,500. After argument, a new trial was refused and judgment entered against the defendant. In an opinion filed by the trial judge, every pertinent question is reviewed and disposed of. Under the authorities cited, we see no reason for disturbing the verdict.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. Randal, 85 Pa. Super. 443, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).
85 Pa. Super. 443 (Walker v. Randal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Follansbee Estate
53 A.2d 864 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
63 P.2d 1006 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1936)