Walker v. Potomac Ferry Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Walker v. Potomac Ferry Co.

10 D.C. 440

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 1, 1881

DocketNo. 14,036

StatusPublished

This text of 10 D.C. 440 (Walker v. Potomac Ferry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Potomac Ferry Co., 10 D.C. 440 (D.C. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

We think that the plaintiffs cannot hold the land in controversy as against the defendants. At common law an alien could not take land by descent. The plaintiffs are nearer of kin to James Dixon, the intestate, than the heirs of an uncle, for they are the children of a sister. But that sister is an alien, and therefore incapable of taking the land by descent. [442]*442The heirs of the uncle, though more x’emote in kindred from the intestate, have the better legal right. It is admitted that they can take title to land, and that they draw their title iu this case through one who was capable of taking the legal inheritance. We think it is impossible for the children of a parent still alive to derive an inheritance', when the mother was herself incapable of acquiring that inheritance on account of alienage.

There must be judgment for the defendants upon the demurrer to the third plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

We think that the plaintiffs cannot hold the land in controversy as against the defendants. At common law an alien could not take land by descent. The plaintiffs are nearer of kin to James Dixon, the intestate, than the heirs of an uncle, for they are the children of a sister. But that sister is an alien, and therefore incapable of taking the land by descent. [442]*442The heirs of the uncle, though more x’emote in kindred from the intestate, have the better legal right. It is admitted that they can take title to land, and that they draw their title iu this case through one who was capable of taking the legal inheritance. We think it is impossible for the children of a parent still alive to derive an inheritance', when the mother was herself incapable of acquiring that inheritance on account of alienage.

There must be judgment for the defendants upon the demurrer to the third plea.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 D.C. 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-potomac-ferry-co-dc-1881.