Walker v. Palace Pharmacy
99 S.E. 393, 23 Ga. App. 723, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 314
This text of 99 S.E. 393 (Walker v. Palace Pharmacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Walker v. Palace Pharmacy, 99 S.E. 393, 23 Ga. App. 723, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 314 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
This ease is controlled by the ruling made by this court in Walker v. Cliff Drug Co., ante, 722; the only point insisted upon by counsel for plaintiff in error being that the evidence was insufficient to authorize the judgment rendered.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sims v. Nelson
121 S.E. 863 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 393, 23 Ga. App. 723, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-palace-pharmacy-gactapp-1919.