Walker v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Walker v. O'Brien

210 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2006·No. No. 06-6717·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nelson Eddy Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by [269]*269the district court. Walker v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00117-gec, 2006 WL 482414 (W.D.Va. filed Feb. 25, 2006 & entered Feb. 27, 2006; Mar. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Nelson Eddy Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by [269]*269the district court. Walker v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00117-gec, 2006 WL 482414 (W.D.Va. filed Feb. 25, 2006 & entered Feb. 27, 2006; Mar. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Walker v. O'Brien, 210 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

210 F. App'x 268 (Walker v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related