Walker v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.

80 A. 486, 79 N.J.L. 602, 50 Vroom 602, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 205
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 16, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 80 A. 486 (Walker v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 80 A. 486, 79 N.J.L. 602, 50 Vroom 602, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 205 (N.J. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the above memorandum.

For affirmance. — Tite Chancellor, Garrison, Reed, Trenohabd, Bergen, Yoorhees, Mintuen, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, YROOM, Dl LL, CONGDON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Anonymous
108 A.2d 882 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Palmore v. Palmore
82 A.2d 104 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1951)
Riesen v. Riesen
147 A. 225 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 A. 486, 79 N.J.L. 602, 50 Vroom 602, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-north-jersey-street-railway-co-nj-1910.