Walker v. New Smyrna Beach Police Department

834 So. 2d 277, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17825, 2002 WL 31728540
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 6, 2002·No. No. 5D01-3488·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carl Walker appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for the return of [278]*278$1,718 seized by the police at the time of his arrest. We affirm. As the appellant, Walker has the burden to demonstrate error. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). At the hearing on his motion, Walker offered no evidence or argument in support of his claim for the return of the cash allegedly seized from him at the time of his arrest. As such, Walker failed to demonstrate that the money was improperly retained by the New Smyrna Beach Police Department.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. New Smyrna Beach Police Department, 834 So. 2d 277, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17825, 2002 WL 31728540 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

834 So. 2d 277 (Walker v. New Smyrna Beach Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vereen v. Alpha Realty & Associates, Inc.
846 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)