Walker v. Monica Rich Kosann
Opinion
USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : ANDREW WALKER, JR., : : Plaintiff, : : 23 Civ. 4409 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER OF SERVICE MONICA RICH KOSANN et al., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action alleging that Defendants infringed on his patented trademark. See Dkt. 1. By order dated May 26, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees. Dkt. 4. Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.1 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for Defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants.
1 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within ninety days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until ninety days after the date summonses are issued. If the Complaint is not served within ninety days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff's responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must also notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. Finally, Plaintiff may consider contacting the New York Legal Assistance Group’s (“NYLAG’”) Clinic for Pro Se Litigants in the Southern District of New York, which is a free legal clinic staffed by attorneys and paralegals to assist those who are representing themselves in civil lawsuits in this court. The clinic is run by a private organization; it is not part of, or run by, the court. It cannot accept filings on behalf of the court, which must still be made by any pro se party through the Pro Se Intake Unit. A copy of the flyer with details of the clinic 1s attached to this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to (1) complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for Monica Rich Kosann; Amazon Advertising LLC; eBay Inc.; Provenance Gems; Fisher-Price; and Woodrow Jewelers; (2) deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service; and (3) mail Plaintiff an information package. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 27, 2023 —Vlbey © 7B New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge
DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES Monica Rich Kosann 10 Columbus, Ground Fl. New York, NY 10019 Amazon Advertising LLC 440 Terry Ave. North Seattle, WA 98109 eBay Inc. Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange St. Wilmington, DE 19801 Provence Gems 6100 Hollywood Blvd., Ste. 530 Hollywood, FL 33024 Fisher-Price 636 Girard Ave. East Aurora, NY 14052 Woodrow Jewelers 21 Purchase St. Rye, NY 10580 SD lee Pe ew Since 1990, NYLAG has provided free civil legal services New York ME Legal Assistance Group to New Yorkers who cannot afford private attorneys.
Free Legal Assistance for Self-Represented Civil Litigants in District Court for the Southern District Of New Yor|
NYLAG Legal Clinic for Pro Se Litigants in the Southern District of New York is a fre clinic staffed by attorneys, law students and paralegals to assist those who are themselves or planning to represent themselves in civil lawsuits in the outhern District of New York. The clinic does not provide full representation. The clinic, is not part of or run by the court, assists litigants with federal civil cases including involving civil rights, employment discrimination, labor law, social security benefit: and tax.
Contact the Clinic: (212) 659-6190 or complete our online intake form (found here: A staff member will contact you within a few days.
looking for assistance can also contact the clinic at the kiosk located across the hall the pro se clinic office in the courthouse.
this time, the clinic offers remote consultations only. Requests for in- appointments will be reviewed on a case-to-case basis. and Hours: Marshall United States Courthouse
Room LL22 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 (212) 659 6190 Open weekdays 10 a.m. — 4 p.m. Closed on federal and court holidays
ii □□□□ □
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. Monica Rich Kosann (Walker v. Monica Rich Kosann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.