Walker v. Missouri Department of Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Walker v. Missouri Department of Insurance

299 S.W.3d 677, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460, 2009 WL 3364368

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 20, 2009

DocketED 92639

StatusPublished

This text of 299 S.W.3d 677 (Walker v. Missouri Department of Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Missouri Department of Insurance, 299 S.W.3d 677, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460, 2009 WL 3364368 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Lonnell Walker, Sr. (Walker) and Walker Services Inc. (Walker Services) appeal from a judgment of the St. Louis County Circuit Court affirming (1) a decision by the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) denying Walker’s application to renew his insurance producer license pursuant to section 375.414.1(2), (4)(8) and (10); and (2) RSMo (Supp.2003) the decision of the AHC disciplining Walker Services and the corresponding decision of the Department of Insurance to revoke Walker Services’ business entity insurance producer license pursuant to section 375.141.1(2), (4) and (8).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Lonnell Walker, Sr. (Walker) and Walker Services Inc. (Walker Services) appeal from a judgment of the St. Louis County Circuit Court affirming (1) a decision by the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) denying Walker’s application to renew his insurance producer license pursuant to section 375.414.1(2), (4)(8) and (10); and (2) RSMo (Supp.2003) the decision of the AHC disciplining Walker Services and the corresponding decision of the Department of Insurance to revoke Walker Services’ business entity insurance producer license pursuant to section 375.141.1(2), (4) and (8).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 S.W.3d 677, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460, 2009 WL 3364368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-missouri-department-of-insurance-moctapp-2009.