Walker v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

272 A.D.2d 57, 707 N.Y.S.2d 165
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 57 (Walker v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 272 A.D.2d 57, 707 N.Y.S.2d 165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered March 4, 1998, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and granted summary judgment to defendants dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Labor Law § 240 was never intended to cover an injury from electrical shock sustained by a worker on a scaffold caused by a dangling electrical extension cord that made contact with a live wire below the scaffold (see, Alfieri v New York City Tr. Auth., 190 AD2d 594, lv denied 82 NY2d 655). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. City of New York
22 A.D.3d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 57, 707 N.Y.S.2d 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-metro-north-commuter-railroad-nyappdiv-2000.