Walker v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
This text of 272 A.D.2d 57 (Walker v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered March 4, 1998, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and granted summary judgment to defendants dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Labor Law § 240 was never intended to cover an injury from electrical shock sustained by a worker on a scaffold caused by a dangling electrical extension cord that made contact with a live wire below the scaffold (see, Alfieri v New York City Tr. Auth., 190 AD2d 594, lv denied 82 NY2d 655). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 57, 707 N.Y.S.2d 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-metro-north-commuter-railroad-nyappdiv-2000.