Walker v. Melcher

14 Mass. 148
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The objection, that the report was not made to the next court after it was agreed upon, is not supported in point [131] of fact. The court being in session upon the 7th of March, the next term holden in June was the proper time for the return and acceptance of the report. »

The referee, who did not join in the report, appears to have been present at the hearing, but did not agree with his brethren as to the amount of the damages. The report by the others is sufficient within the statute and the agreement of the parties.

The certificate of the referees, that they had fully heard the parties, is a sufficient answer to the third objection.

Alden for the defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Melcher, 14 Mass. 148 (Mass. 1817).

14 Mass. 148 (Walker v. Melcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Hoffman
26 N.J.L. 175 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1857)
Carpenter v. Wood
42 Mass. 409 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1840)
Inhabitants of Cumberland v. Inhabitants of North-Yarmouth
4 Me. 459 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1827)
Gibbs v. Bryant
18 Mass. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1822)
Noyes v. Noyes
18 Mass. 269 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1822)