Walker v. Leighton
11 Mass. 140
Opinion
The evidence offered for the defendants was irrelative, and impertinent to the issue on trial; and evidence is as well to be rejected for its impertinence as for its incompetency
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. Leighton, 11 Mass. 140 (Mass. 1814).
11 Mass. 140 (Walker v. Leighton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldstein v. Katz
91 N.E.2d 237 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Fine v. City Five Cents Savings Bank
6 Mass. App. Div. 198 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1941)
Graham v. Meddleby
100 N.E. 750 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
McGuinness v. Kyle
94 N.E. 700 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Simmons v. Shaw
52 N.E. 1087 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Brooks v. Stackpole
47 N.E. 419 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Crittenden v. Alexander
81 Mass. 432 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1860)
Allen v. Blunt
1 F. Cas. 450 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1846)
Bullard v. Dorsey
15 Miss. 9 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1846)
Warren v. Wells
42 Mass. 80 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1840)
Woods v. Carlisle
6 N.H. 27 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1832)
Ross v. Knight
4 N.H. 236 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1827)