Walker v. L. N. Dantzler Lumber Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Walker v. L. N. Dantzler Lumber Co.

60 So. 1013, 103 Miss. 826

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1912·Published

Opinion

Reed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The trial court gave a peremptory instruction to the jury to find for the appellee in this case. A review of the case leads us to the conclusion that there was a conflict of testimony regarding the delivery of logs and the settlement of the mutual accounts between the parties to the extent that the trial court should have permitted the jury to pass upon the facts in conflict.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The trial court gave a peremptory instruction to the jury to find for the appellee in this case. A review of the case leads us to the conclusion that there was a conflict of testimony regarding the delivery of logs and the settlement of the mutual accounts between the parties to the extent that the trial court should have permitted the jury to pass upon the facts in conflict.

Reversed and remanded.

Walker v. L. N. Dantzler Lumber Co., 60 So. 1013, 103 Miss. 826 (Mich. 1912).

Pincite

60 So. 1013 (Walker v. L. N. Dantzler Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.